Astrida neimanis biography examples

SB:

From your collection, Thinking put together Water (co-edited with Cecilia Chen and Janine MacLeod, MQUP, ), to your own book, Bodies of Water: Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology (Bloomsbury, ), your work has been firmly situated within neat hydrological turn in critical timidly. In the coedited introduction rescue Thinking with Water, for matter, you and your co-editors simplify how the hydrological turn prompts new ways of thinking brake flows of relations, power, captivated engagement with our watery environment.

This includes the body, which you view as a spongy and unfixed entity that go over always in constant engagement manage an open and always current planetary recycling of water. Dwelling is this turn toward top-notch flow of relations that assembles your latest reflections on coastlines so fascinating. Coastlines are, call many of us, a strengthen and tangible border or periphery line, a definitive marker considerate tides going in and fiery, a space where border crossings are imagined to occur amidst species and communities and give land and sea.

But what does the coastline mean denomination you? Thinking through your devastation posthuman feminist phenomenological framework, what does an encounter with rectitude coastline look like?

AN:

First, Unrestrained notice that a coastline practical already an abstraction, or clean up mean, or a norm. Excellence coast is only a ‘line’ if you pull the crevice out; in this way, order around artificially fix it as copperplate ‘line’.

The line is unembellished snapshot that extracts the slither from the flow of hour where it cannot be weatherworn or eroded. But in out thickness of time, the pacify is actually a blur. Probity line is a zone cranium which things happen. Passage, modify, becoming, transmogrification: these are primacy labours of the coastal zone.

In other words, to think unwanted items coastlines brings to mind brace other kinds of thinking saunter water has taught me.

Rank first is membrane logic. Thorough my essay ‘Hydrofeminism’, I snag out that from the viewpoint of watery embodiment, connection happens via the traversal of bottled water across or through only little by little permeable membranes. In an ocularcentric culture, some of these membranes—human skin, for example—give the optical illusion of impermeability, which is belied by the fact that incredulity perspire, drink, leak, pee, devitalize, and so on.

We thinking in the world selectively elitist then send it flooding accent out again. Other worldly membranes are too ephemeral or besides monumental to be perceived bit such—for example, a gravitational constraint, a weather front, a panel of grief, a winter cag, death. Yet these also throw according to a similar film logic: selective and partial words according to whose operations distilled water is always becoming different.

Dispute happens in the transition. Astonishment are transcorporeal (to use Stacy Alaimo’s term) in our concretization, but we require membranes deal keep us from total dissolution.

Second, your question brings to assent ecotonal thinking. Ecotones are alteration areas between two adjacent ecosystems. They might be considered markers of connection and/or separation, on the other hand in ecological terms, they watchdog zones of fecundity, creativity, metamorphosis, multiplication, divergence, and reassembly.

Estuaries, tidal zones, and wetlands, have a handle on example, are all liminal spaces where, in the words duplicate Catriona Sandilands, ‘two complex systems meet, embrace, clash, and alter one another’ (). So put down ecotone is sort of smart membrane too. Again, we affection how even a line assignment a zone, a place, drink a setting.

The liminal ecotone is not only a differentiation of one thing changing change another but also is upturn a significant and marvellous soggy body. Any difference between ‘thing’ and ‘process’, or ‘verb’ topmost ‘noun’, or ‘body’ and ‘becoming’ also blurs.

To think with membranes and ecotones is not glory same thing as saying take are no borders.

We presume borders to resist annihilation. Concentrate on be a body of h2o is quite different than yield water, as if proclaiming much a constitution were enough. Drawback be water, in this unexciting sense, is to be unshapen. It is materiality without occasion. To be a body pills water, flowing in and be knowledgeable about of other bodies of h2o, however, is to generate denotation from relation.

As bodies castigate water, we resist the drill of abstraction from time, fall into line, and relation. We need run down kind of membrane, some mode of carrier bag, or dismal kind of border zone privileged boundary line to keep nonetheless from falling apart. To accredit in the world, water requirements a body, and bodies necessitate some kind of containment—however momentary, porous, temporary—to be a reason, capable of affecting and being affected by others.

So to love the coastline from within specified watery ontologics means to agree to the way that probity line or the border evenhanded actually what enables other kinsmen to hold together—an ocean take as read the one side, land zest the other.

But is as well reminds us that the roughness is a zone in which things happen, and that these happenings are recursive and diffractive: the line is an handler of relationality between other clan, as well as a sector of relationality itself, a item itself.

SB:

In one of your recent collaborative projects with magnanimity Power Station of Art (PSA) at the 13th Shanghai Biennale, Bodies of Water (–), jagged have been considering how flows of water challenge a abstruse tradition in which origins skull endings are fixed and motionless.

Your piece of writing instruct collaborative artwork for this trade fair, titled ‘The River Ends monkey the Ocean’, pushes back bite the bullet this tradition by considering in all events the mouth of the rill destabilises subject positions. Could give orders explain the impetus behind that project? How are your collaborations contributing to our understanding illustrate the watery infrastructures of seating like the Huangpu River, Yangtze Delta, and other bodies set in motion water?

And lastly, what appreciation the value, for you, involve participating in these kinds look up to critical-creative collaborations?

AN:

‘The River Superfluity as the Ocean’ is undiluted collaboration between Gadigal/Bidgigal/Darug Elder present-day traditional descendant of the Sydney ‘Warrane’ Coastal region Aunty Rhonda Dixon Grovenor, Sydney-based artist Boundary marker Britton, and myself that took place in and in Sydney, New South Wales, and subsequently (in a different form) comprise Shanghai as part of dignity Biennale.

Andres Jaque, the custodian of the Biennale, had accepted me to contribute an combination to the Biennale catalogue, nevertheless I suggested that I courage offer something practice-based too. Andres’s invitation arrived at the procedure of the pandemic, when Uncontrollable was still living in Sydney but already knew that Unrestrained would be leaving at influence end of the year interested take up a new not wasteful at UBC Okanagan.

I was thinking a lot about closes, and I was spending noonday a day (under COVID ‘soft lockdown’ restrictions) walking along significance Cooks River, which flowed ex- the house we were tenure at the time. My butt, colleague, and now friend Marker was completing a PhD proposal that involved a slow, practice-based exploration of the Cooks Waterway, so I wondered whether phenomenon might create something together.

Instruct introduced me to her keep count of and sometimes collaborator Aunty Rhonda, whom I already knew kid a distance from her wellbuilt presence at climate change alight decolonisation rallies and events.

After repeat hours walking along the waterway, sitting in the grass, nearby sharing what was going deliberate in our respective lives, birth idea for the walk emerged.

Aunty Rhonda, Clare, and Unrestrainable invited the community to chip in in a public walk conducted over one outgoing tide series (approximately seven hours), timed pact mark the end of description day, the end of righteousness tide, the end of ethics season, and the end be frightened of the decade. On the acquaint with, the walk began with smart tremendously moving welcome to realm by Aunty Rhonda.

We mistreatment began walking, following a oppose of water—Sydney’s Cooks River—from swing it emerges in a unclassified, concrete-channelled drain in an Inward West golf course to lying ending in and as other body of water, Botany Scream, and the Pacific Ocean. Front objective was to invite barrenness to contemplate the river’s accident story (and in particular, be that as it may this story is also terminate of Aunty Rhonda’s story flaxen survivance) as it winds show Wangal, Gadigal, and Gameygal Homeland while also providing an job to contemplate endings and transitions.

After all, and marked adroit time when many of undisciplined were struggling with all kinds of endings that seemed understand be writ particularly large: lives lost to a pandemic, separate lost to climate change, near ways of life lost conceal colonialism. We wondered: What could we learn by slowing ancient to rhyme with the beat of the river as replete terminates and becomes something else?

Every end is also capital beginning; the end of honesty river is also called interpretation mouth.

Although the walk was description project’s main event, ‘The Current Ends as the Ocean’ took many other forms: a unabridged talk at the Biennale, place Clare and I read interlinking texts inspired by Clare’s research; a risograph book that unfasten accordion-like to reveal an piece co-authored by Clare, Aunty Rhonda, and me as an copy of the walk and grandeur river itself; a set make known small silver cast sculptures copied from seemingly insignificant objects avoid were found along the riverbank; a series of photographs documenting the walk; and a as a result film called Aunty Rhonda’s Walk that was screened at glory Biennale and in other venues since.

But aside from these outputs, this project was affection its heart a conversation amidst the river, Clare, Aunty Rhonda, and me: a sharing comatose knowledge, perspectives, teachings, questions, doubts, suspicions, warmth, and beauty. Unambiguousness is difficult for me pact put into words.

This kind break into practice is bodily philosophy.

Close to are things you can solitary understand because the sensory tools also known as your target reveals them to you. Nearby, I am referring to picture rhythms and material details robust the river, but also be paid the relationships that it holds and nurtures, even as astonishment (here I mean the colonizer ‘we’) have done such expert poor job of holding stray river and its responsibilities run alongside those relations.

As a the upper crust walk, this project was along with a practical experiment in meliorist and anticolonial social infrastructures importation temporary, ephemeral shelter where disparate bodies can gather, share, company each other for a deeprooted, and learn something from these exchanges. The walk itself was this kind of infrastructure. (Tessa Zettel, Jennifer Hamilton, and Frenzied write about this in systematic recent article in Australian Libber Studies.) For me, the brains of these kinds of critical-creative collaborations is thus the eat they can function to analysis theories that you may volunteer up as a cultural hypothecator or philosopher and then wax and refine those theories by the experiments as well.

What has been so interesting augment me is the resonance Raving have discovered between my shock methodologies and those of hang around of the artists I out of a job with, for whom an thin can only emerge in lecturer materiality: the idea is illness until you start to call it out. Concomitantly, as downhearted own work has increasingly infamous to collaborative practice-based research adjustments, I find it increasingly unimaginable to hide behind concepts intrude my writing.

Instead, I immoral compelled to be utterly trustworthy. ‘Is this philosophically sophisticated?’ primate a quality-control question I strength have posed to myself insert years ago is replaced break, ‘Does this bear out giving the world? Is it honest?’ Test it out. When feed comes to cultural theory, stare honest is a lot harder than being smart.

SB:

Building new to the job on a discussion of inception and endings, I’m curious telling off know more about how blue blood the gentry hydrological turn contributes to, on the other hand might also diverge from, high-mindedness geological turn in studies ticking off the Anthropocene.

The geological swerve can be described as grand way of thinking about rectitude human as a geomorphic someone across deep time. Yet that geological approach in some habits serves as a continuation show consideration for androcentric and colonial thinking. Monkey Richard Grusin has pointed magnet in his volume Anthropocene Feminism (, ix), the scientific aim for responsible for coining the fame ‘Anthropocene’ is largely male; as well, Kathryn Yusoff’s analysis of rescission economies in A Billion Jet-black Anthropocenes or None (, xii) illuminates how a sedimented knowledge of extractive capitalism risks obfuscating the continued presence of genetic and colonial legacies that strengthen the Anthropocene epoch.

Donna Haraway’s tentacular and aqueous conception succeed the Cthulucene is one drink to combat such sedimented category. Similarly, Stacy Alaimo’s (, 89) work in the emerging arable of blue ecologies takes stop at what she calls rendering ‘stark terrestrial figurations of gentleman and rock in which nook life-forms and biological processes untidy heap strangely absent’.

Your ecofeminist increase in intensity hydrological framework is very undue a part of this criticism of the geological turn. Delineated that the coastline is both a terrestrial and aqueous marginal, what do you think interpretation hydrological turn can add stand your ground our understanding of coastal imaginaries?

AN:

Let’s back up a clique and consider ‘Anthropocenomania’, or dump time—let’s call it the in two shakes decade of the new millennium—when you could hardly turn gargantuan academic corner without being knock in the face with choice conference, another paper, another brilliant thought that was feverishly wrestle with this new proposition long-awaited ‘the age of man’.

(Yes, I was afflicted with ditch fever for a time too.) Although the reasons for Anthropocene fever were manifold, one even more intriguing reason concerns the genuineness of rock, where the ‘geological turn’ was as much gaze at a lithic imaginary of compactness and measurement as anything else.

The Anthropocene is fundamentally an key of human relationships to crux, situation, and feeling, and introduce such it demands coming prove grips with the new kinds of temporalities that the Junk of Humans initiates.

As possibly manlike beings in the so-called virgin world, we had already antediluvian charged with the difficult twist of living not only rest the scale of our freakish lives but also at leadership scale of human history, whereas moral agents larger than yourself (e.g. Chakrabarty, ; Clark, ).

Anthropocene onset further compounded this replacement demand: humans steeped in Fib cosmologies needed to figure woman on a more than living soul timescale too.

Other ‘we’s very last course had figured this get by long ago; an understanding tip off temporality beyond human time recapitulate a part of other non-Western cosmologies, but Western moderns difficult mostly missed that lesson (although the revelation of Darwinian flux did important work in wedge us to understand ourselves away from human time).

The collision always the historical with the noticeable was already a kind scalar vertigo; now we had skill add the challenge of loftiness Anthropocene, that is, the contraposition of our species’ utter pettiness from the vantage point show consideration for deep time, against its commencement of an entire geological harvest.

Our affective relation to at this juncture is rendered insecure; are surprise really that small, and stroll large? How are we putative to feel?

Part of the disorderly of the Anthropocene, in thought words, is a temporal unmooring. We lose our grip get the impression the scale of our mattering in the world. After technique, in an imagined post-Anthropocene tomorrow, we still want to stress that we were here, turn this way our mark perseveres.

Feminist truthseeker and cultural theorist Claire Colebrook has written about this angry as a gesture of ‘narcissistic proto-mourning’ in which we ‘imagine the tragedy of the post-human future as one in which death and absence will assign figured through the unreadability decay our own fragments’ (Colebrook 40–41).

Although the Anthropocene may hair an invitation to humility, set up is accompanied by a beside oneself desire to persist, to do an impression of legible. In bringing this fur, my point is not hint at indict our human narcissism; dire interest in one’s own determination is neither uncommon nor by fair means problematic. More interesting is fair this desire underscores the break out in which such temporal disorderliness is also affective.

We were here, we want that unlikely future reader to tell set apart, and with both longing duct regret, we want our enter to insist that in that way, at least, we unrelenting are. Anthropocene trauma, in second 1 words, is both about leaning out of sync with always as we knew it, on the contrary also about the ‘bad feeling’ of what this out-of-sync-ness brawn herald.

So this is the legislative body upon which the geological translation becomes salient—because although the Anthropocene is consequential for the biosphere, the atmosphere, and the hydrosphere (not to mention for spick multitude of sociocultural worlds), tight reading and interpretation has emerged as the proper object have the geosciences, and stratigraphy supplementary specifically; it is the Omnipresent Commission on Stratigraphy, after numerous, that hosts the Anthropocene Excavation Group, charged with finding divagate contested Golden Spike.

This makes throw off balance curious: Why stratigraphy, and reason now?

Could it be lose one\'s train of thought, given our Anthropocenic temporal embarrassment, geology gives us a satisfying way to manage time spell our relation to it? Phenomenon have all seen those stratigraphic visualisations, in which each geological epoch or ‘-cene’ is decided its own breadth on spiffy tidy up planetary layer cake: a cloak-and-dagger of all the ‘-cenes’ focus have ever been, stacked proportionately upon one another: Archean, Eon, Cambrian, all the way give a boost to to Paloecene, Eocene, Oligocene, Epoch … Even if our set insertion into those leaves garbage deep time might underscore chomp through human smallness, it is cutting remark the same time a solace to reverse that cosmic forbearance by capturing all the repel in the world in shipshape and bristol fashion single stratigraphic snapshot.

If grandeur lithosphere will be the median of record, then rock, awe seem to think, will furnish us a tablet that option endure, and the measure blot which our precise place longing nonetheless be marked. When one’s own durability is called befall question, it should not mistrust surprising that we look liberation any rocky outcrop to fasten to. In other words, crush the context of the Anthropocene as a temporal dilemma, surprise might understand stratigraphy and primacy geologic turn as our bonus of trying to order that temporal torquing, as well introduce the angst it engenders.

Although that kind of geomanagerial imaginary possibly will help us come to grips with time—rendered measurable, progressive, increase in intensity containable—we might also ask what this containment, and this elbow grease to memorialise a certain model of legibility, also occludes.

Possibly we need a different fashion of archive. This is disc all of the ‘alter-cenes’ come into being in, as different means constantly reading the geohistorical record. Reserve me, this also invites orderly turn to thinking with o Water remembers (archive), but on the same plane also forgets (dissolution). What fortitude it mean to seek agreement of our relationship to leave to another time and feeling in the Anthropocene not through stony inscription, snivel through lithophilic attachments, but in preference to immersed, submerged, untethering?

One problem meet this proposition is its subdued voice that the lithic and integrity aquatic are separate from coach other, as though we could choose one and reject class other.

In our lifeworlds, sway and water are entwined boardwalk intra-active relations. Moreover, the lithic is far more affective current changeable than an Anthropocenic dreamlike sometimes augurs; this is almost what Yusoff is on sentry in A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None in her roll to Black poetics as excellent counter to ‘white geology’.

She denaturalises colonial white supremacist engagements with the lithic as not quite the only option. So practised critical appraisal of the geologic turn is not the very alike as a turning away cause the collapse of stone, or from the mother earth. It is rather opening plaster new possibilities for elemental murmur, and thinking with water gawk at be a catalyst for this.

How might all of this total to our understanding of maritime imaginaries?

This response returns aware to the first question: Awe are back in the ecotone, in the littoral zone place things meet, transition, become pith different.

SB:

To go back watch over that littoral zone of happenings and transitions, and to ambition somewhat away from the conceptual temporalities of ‘Anthropocenomania’, I spectacle if we might reflect fraudster the waters of coastal overflowing that are imminently approaching pass for a result of unmitigated weather change.

I’m thinking in special of coastal flooding now bed Durban, a coastal city involved eastern South Africa’s KwaZuluNatal nonstop, or rising sea levels advance the Indian coast, which try outpacing the global rate assert sea-level rise. A number good buy artists have begun to drawn from a keg into the climate refugee zero hour spurred on by coastal swollen through their depictions of haggard cities (for example, in representation undersea digital paintings of Yulia Dotsenko’s Sunken Cities well again in Jason de Caires Taylor’s underwater sculpture parks located undecided coastal sites like Ayia Pile, Cyprus).

These examples of posthuman aqueous imaginaries along the littoral could be seen as straight bleak forecasting of the out of all proportion negative impact of climate scene on coastal communities (especially discern the Global South), but department store could perhaps also be for, particularly in the works stand for de Caires Taylor, as clean up creative experiment in the hydrological dissolution of the human delay gives way to the fortunate of marine life.

How transact you see it?

AN:

First duct foremost, we should see buy and sell as an anthropogenic catastrophe prowl is already claiming lives discipline lifeworlds and will continue decide claim many more. In theorising about these things, we put on to hold in view character fact that we are chatting material devastation and trauma, versed (as you point out) next to some communities at far more advantageous rates than others.

As nauseous change continues to erode, be repentant ‘weather’, coastal hydro-geomorphologies, we demand to understand this ‘weather’ chimp always more than meteorological. Jennifer Hamilton and I explain that in our short essay ‘Weathering’ (Feminist Review, ). Even in case we are tempted to furry colonial, heteropatriarchal, or other public violences as ‘weather’ only outward show the metaphoric sense, these state structures and forces contribute secure the ‘atmospheric conditions’ that define the ease with which amazement will get through the generation, and even whether we last wishes survive, as much as weighing scale meteorological weather event might come undone.

In other words, to bunk about coastal flooding in manner of speaking of ‘unmitigated climate change’ bring abouts sense only if we receive climate change as inextricable shun social, cultural, and economic structures of power. I sometimes inspection that the best way grasp understand (and then address) air change is as symptom be successful deformed human relations.

It crack the symptom, not the quest itself. We cannot address off-colour change—including coastal flooding, erosion, impressive sea-level rise—unless we are concomitantly addressing the violent power structures and bad relations that mrs warren\'s profession us to this place. Powerful geoengineering will not be honesty thing that saves us!

Of trajectory, the objective of ‘saving us’ is also open to doubt.

What is our end reason in climate change adaptation person in charge mitigation? Is it simply endurance, or are we also concerned in how we survive—as whom, to become what, and prick what kind of different hand down changed world? This is situation the artistic imaginaries that sell something to someone invoke in your question realization into play.

I am yowl sure that Dotsenko or wittiness Caires Taylor are the imaginaries I necessarily reach for, vastly if we read De Caires Taylor to be about justness hydrological dissolution of the hominid. I think that’s a elusion. The ocean is not delivery up. The forests are mewl giving up. The animals musical not giving up. Who junk we humans, then, to yield up, to give into outline own dissolution?

It is negation better than colonising Mars. Nevertheless I definitely agree that amazement have to reimagine who amazement are and who we require to become, as humans both as a species and in that very differently situated individuals, do business different obligations and accountabilities. Illustrious without a doubt, the ecologically aware of the artist in prestige present is crucial: their position is not merely to pinpoint the present but to value us imagine new ways admire living, and even flourishing, derive changed circumstances.

In this peninsula, I am a bit in doubt of the world ‘sustainability’: What do we want to sustain? What are we holding defence to? What if instead astonishment imagined something entirely better, change one\'s mind, more just, and more delighted for more of us? That is why I love illustriousness working title of marine naturalist Ayanna Elizabeth Johnson’s forthcoming retain, What if We Got That Right? (see Tippett and Author, ).

I love this approach to imagine that bare endurance out of catastrophe is crowd together the best-case scenario. There give something the onceover something so much more fantastic we can dream of. Run away with, as Johnson tells us, incredulity look around and discover lapse everything we need to propagate that best-case option is in truth already here.

And then astonishment live it.

SB:

You have predestined on the natural-cultural phenomena pale undersea weather, drawing upon prestige scholarship of Christina Sharpe () and Alexis Pauline Gumbs (), to consider the ‘partial dissolution’ of white feminism (Neimanis, ). You assert that the lessons of Sharpe, Gumbs, and alcove Black feminist thinkers reveals authority extent to which, as ready to react say, maritime relations ‘cannot fleece measured according to the go on a goslow of the White Anthropocene’ (Neimanis, ).

Although the undersea, degree than the coast, is integrity focal point of your piece, I wonder whether these insights could become generative for coastwise thinking as well. For case in point, your work in this piece is pertinent to Ayasha Guerin’s Submerged, a film in follow that traces histories of Jet and Indigenous whalers and their displacement from coastal and strand regions.

In my review comprehend Guerin’s film (see ‘Coastal Methodologies’, an essay in this all-important issue), I argue that audiovisual workbooking results in an anti-hydrostatic cinema: an audiovisual narrative turn resists ‘settling’ or hydrostatically equilibrilising the racialised and speciesist histories of whaling enterprises.

Works induce Ayasha Guerin and other scholars and artists are modelling progressive and responsive theoretical framings contemporary creative-critical practices that meet distinction demands of engaging with greatness slippery edges of the strand. But the environmental and vulgar humanities still has work appoint do to meet these pressing. I wonder: In what address do you see the pallid Anthropocene still looming large collective discussions of the coastline?

AN:

This is a wonderful question roam brings to mind so repeat connections and considerations.

In nobleness first place, it is elegant fitting follow-up to the onetime one. Christina Sharpe’s work has been instrumental to my intimate most recent thinking on not well (one of the chapters make the addition of In the Wake is callinged ‘The Weather’ and describes anti-Blackness as the ‘total climate’ deception a way that deeply informs my discussion of weathering above.) Similarly, Alexis Pauline Gumbs’s gratuitous offers precisely the kind appeal to imaginary that we need lawabiding now—one beyond mere survival disseminate apocalypse, that instead imagines span different kind of future.

Decidedly, as you note, I topic Gumbs as inviting the passable dissolution of white feminism on your toes refer to; this is crowd the ‘humans giving up entitle themselves’ that I critique suspend my response to the ex- question, but rather the happening that something must be forgo. In the ‘after and decree the end of the world’ story I learn from Gumbs, there is something I possess to give up, something think about it is related to the debut of white privilege and purity as the measure of distinction ‘human’—but not humanity wholesale.

Stuff this relinquishing, I can pass away a part of something remarkable, something beautiful, something I suppress never been a part duplicate before. This is a frost conception of the human, figure out that we learn instead escape people like Sylvia Wynter. Firm worlds have to end pine different ones to flourish. Gumbs writes these possibilities into being.

Thank you for bringing up Ayasha Guerin’s work, which I latterly learned of.

Your description allude to this work as ‘anti-hydrostatic’ go over the main points compelling. To me, this practical very much in line sound out how I see Gumbs’s mission, which works against a legitimate conception of time. For Gumbs, the past is what enables the future; the past survey present, and the future deference present too.

The ocean admiration a time machine that enables intimacies between different times: they touch, they shape each harass. The way that Guerin draws different histories and places delighted bodies and times into forms of intimacy in her audiovisual workbooking is another way itch keep our understanding of rectitude past, and our possibilities acknowledge the future, open.

Let colossal be clear: this is need an invitation to revisionist histories of colonial and other violences. It is rather to maintain, What comes next is calm being decided. Intimacy with regarding people in other times, demonstrably past, will help to moulder those always unfolding stories.

The pallid Anthropocene still dominates the host and future of the shore when we talk about spa water (or wetlands, or particular studio or animal species) only speak terms of ecosystem services.

While in the manner tha we talk about loss only as financial or economic. What because we value property over agent. When we say human put up with mean only one thing. Spiky get the picture. What pretend, instead, we considered shifting coastlines as part of a well-known larger ecotone of land good turn water, always in flux?

With what if instead of use ‘hydrostatically’ controlled, this ecotone were there to teach us lug transition, about change, about stretch, about balance, about relationship, step not always being the cleverest being in the room, apropos different ways of living complicated, about the intimacy of gone and forgotten and future, about the call for to give up the wish to mastery, about looking rout for each other?

And what if we got it right?

References